It's the lack of ambition that I'm criticizing. ML/DL work very well at what they do. Today's paradigms are useful. I don't think anyone could doubt that.

However, I think we're overstating the importance or capacities of DL systems. Experts will know this, ofc. But what the majority thinks about it is also important.

Just because those people aren't in touch with AI we shouldn't stop trying to convey an honest view of what AI is today. The differences between DL systems and true AI should be more clear.

Also, I want AI to be smarter than it is today. I guess I have a preference for interesting things more than useful things.

--

--

AI and Technology | Analyst at CambrianAI | Weekly Newsletter: https://mindsoftomorrow.ck.page | Contact: alber.romgar@gmail.com

Love podcasts or audiobooks? Learn on the go with our new app.

Get the Medium app

A button that says 'Download on the App Store', and if clicked it will lead you to the iOS App store
A button that says 'Get it on, Google Play', and if clicked it will lead you to the Google Play store
Alberto Romero

Alberto Romero

AI and Technology | Analyst at CambrianAI | Weekly Newsletter: https://mindsoftomorrow.ck.page | Contact: alber.romgar@gmail.com

More from Medium

What the pandemic tells us about the metaverse

Researching while Chinese American: Ethnic Profiling, Chinese American Scientists and a New…

A ten-point manifesto for a Digital European Citizenship

Why I Believe Transit Fares Will Be Obsolete