Thank you for the comment Allan! I laughed at that last bit :)

I wouldn't say LaMDA is anywhere close to human-level conversations just yet. Human language is already complex at the syntactic and semantic levels, but the pragmatic level is simply unreachable for today's AI.

Neither LaMDA, nor GPT-3, nor a hypothetical GPT-4, nor any other neural network-based system could navigate the pragmatic level of human communication. They simply don't have access to the context. That's something to think about for the future of NLP.

Cheers :)

--

--

AI & Tech | Analyst at CambrianAI | Weekly AI Newsletter: https://thealgorithmicbridge.substack.com/ | Contact: alber.romgar@gmail.com

Love podcasts or audiobooks? Learn on the go with our new app.

Get the Medium app

A button that says 'Download on the App Store', and if clicked it will lead you to the iOS App store
A button that says 'Get it on, Google Play', and if clicked it will lead you to the Google Play store
Alberto Romero

Alberto Romero

AI & Tech | Analyst at CambrianAI | Weekly AI Newsletter: https://thealgorithmicbridge.substack.com/ | Contact: alber.romgar@gmail.com

More from Medium

The Story of 5G

January 2022: WildMeta update

Why we Need Art to Cocreate the Societal Impact of AI