Thank you for the response! I'd say it's more bittersweet.

"Most big breakthroughs came through engineering by finding ways to scale up further and further." I don't think that's true. Science studies and discovers the principles behind the phenomena. Engineering builds upon that. However, the limits of engineering are definitely set by the scope of science. Most breakthroughs in AI happened either because cognitive sciences were advancing, computer science permitted them or because some group of scientists, that perfectly understood the principles behind the machines, created something new.

Scaling up doesn't need much understanding. And without understanding, there's no breakthrough (only by rare serendipity).

Cheers :)

--

--

AI and Technology | Analyst at CambrianAI | Weekly Newsletter: https://mindsoftomorrow.ck.page | Contact: alber.romgar@gmail.com

Love podcasts or audiobooks? Learn on the go with our new app.

Get the Medium app

A button that says 'Download on the App Store', and if clicked it will lead you to the iOS App store
A button that says 'Get it on, Google Play', and if clicked it will lead you to the Google Play store
Alberto Romero

Alberto Romero

AI and Technology | Analyst at CambrianAI | Weekly Newsletter: https://mindsoftomorrow.ck.page | Contact: alber.romgar@gmail.com

More from Medium

Inside Plus: Wiley Deck, Vice President of Government Affairs and Public Policy

NASA announces first astronaut to walk on Mars

Mudley Project#2 Timebase Rebalance AI — Payoff#10

How “The Matrix” taught us to talk about AI and the Internet and what it can teach us about our…

WARNER BROS.